Scientific discipline

A claim is worth what it allows others to verify.

AffectiveAI Research publishes the epistemic status of its materials so that a productive question, a technical specification and a validated result are never treated as the same thing.

Evidence scale

Five states that must not be conflated.

01

Question

A bounded problem whose answer is not yet known.

Open
02

Hypothesis

A provisional explanation accompanied by refutation conditions.

Under research
03

Specification

A formulation precise enough to guide prototypes, tests or review.

Versioned
04

Internal evidence

Exploratory or synthetic results with scope and limitations declared.

Not external
05

External validation

Independent testing under a public protocol and an identified institution.

Pending

Method

A reviewable chain of work.

The programme connects question, hypothesis, operational definition, test design, ethical review, evidence record and publication. Each step can correct the one before it.

Publication alone does not turn a claim into evidence. It enables others to inspect its scope, examine the reasoning and identify errors.

Read the method →

Structural separation

Research, engineering and validation serve different functions.

R

Research formulates

Defines questions, boundaries, hypotheses and failure conditions.

E

Engineering implements

Translates part of the knowledge into systems without turning trade secrets into scientific claims.

V

Validation tests

Must remain independent enough to publish favourable, null or adverse findings.

Technical depth does not require disclosing an implementable recipe. It requires precision about what is claimed, what evidence supports it and what remains unproven.